Nuclear stockpile non-shocker

Posted: August 16, 2011 in Songs of Space and Nuclear War
Tags: , ,

The not-shocking conclusion of team of statisticians  is if we reduce our sample size/reduce the data collection on the nuclear stockpile, we’ll have reduced confidence in its ability to operate as designed.

"It’s commonly suggested that we turn off data collection or slow down data collection. When you are fairly certain that you have an aging stockpile, our study shows that ignoring the problem by not collecting data is a huge mistake," [Brigham Young University statistics professor Shane] Reese said.

That statement makes me feel better about my understanding of statistical theory.

Reese and his team determined that should the federal government reduce arsenal monitoring by 50 percent, the reliability that the weapon would operate as intended would fall by 15 percent to 80 percent over a seven-year period. Should monitoring be halted entirely, confidence in a weapon’s performance would fall to close to 50 percent.

Better stated is this version:

If the government cut monitoring in half, confidence in the system’s reliability would drop from 95 to 80 percent within seven years. And if monitoring stopped altogether, the reliability would drop to almost the same odds that you’d find with flipping a coin.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s